Eberhart v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(a), which parallels Bankruptcy Rule 4004, is a claims-processing rule subject to waiver or forfeiture
• ruling that the government forfeits its defense of untimeliness if it fails to raise the defense before the district court reaches the merits of the Rule 33 motion
• holding that the time limit and extension requirements set forth in Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 33 and 45 are claim-processing rules and nonjurisdictional
• ruling that the government forfeits its defense of untimeliness if it fails to raise the defense before the district court reaches the merits of the Rule 33 motion
• holding that the time limit to move for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(b)(2) is claim-processing rule forfeited by government's failure to timely raise it
• holding that time limits set out in Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 33 and 45 are nonjurisdictional claim-processing rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).