Supreme Court· 1/14/2004

Kontrick v. Ryan

Citations

540 U.S. 443
124 S. Ct. 906
157 L. Ed. 2d 867
2004 U.S. LEXIS 663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Rule 4004 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure was not jurisdictional in part because it was not grounded in a statute
holding that “the filing deadline[ ] prescribed in Bankruptcy Rule[ ] 4004 ... do[es] not delineate what cases bankruptcy courts are competent to adjudicate”
holding that “the filing deadline[] prescribed in Bankruptcy Rule[] 4004 . . . do[es] not delineate what cases bankruptcy courts are competent to adjudicate”
holding that time limit for creditors to file objections to discharge in bankruptcy was not jurisdictional
holding that time limit for creditors to file objections to discharge in bankruptcy was not jurisdictional
holding that under the separation of powers doctrine, only Congress can expand or contract the subject-matter jurisdiction of a lower Article III court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

927 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kontrick v. Ryan

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.