Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/12/2011

State v. Ali

Citations

806 N.W.2d 45
2011 Minn. LEXIS 632
2011 WL 4809219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that defendants often have superior information about their age, and thus a preponderance standard is appropriate
noting that defendants often have superior information about their age and birthdates, and thus a preponderance standard is appropriate
“We have long recognized that, in the civil context, an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is immediately appealable as of right.”
“[B]ecause the criminal defendant and the State have an equal interest in trying the defendant in the proper court, preponderance of the evidence is the proper standard of proof .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.