Colorado Court of Appeals· 1/25/2007

People v. Grant

Citations

174 P.3d 798
2007 Colo. App. LEXIS 104
2007 WL 177679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the prosecutor’s one brief misstatement of the law in closing argument did not constitute plain error
noting that, “where reasonable minds could differ, the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction”
stating that evidence about a defendant’s mental 4 state may be inferred from the defendant’s conduct
explaining that we decline to consider an argument asserted for the first time in a reply brief
declining to consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief
“‘A defendant’s mental state may be inferred from his or her conduct and other evidence,’ including the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dailey, Hawthorne, Furman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Grant

334 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.