Skip to main content

People v. Grant

Citations

  • 596 N.E.2d 813
  • 232 Ill. App. 3d 93
  • 173 Ill. Dec. 189
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • instances of prior sexual activity may be admitted to explain the presence of semen in the complainant
  • instances of prior sexual activity may be admitted to explain the presence of semen in the complainant
  • instances of prior sexual activity may be admitted to explain the presence of semen in the complainant
  • defendant sought to introduce evidence that victim had prior sexual relations with a boyfriend but did not put forth an adequate offer of proof with specific information regarding the date, time, or location of alleged sexual contact
  • defendant sought to introduce evidence that victim had prior sexual relations with a boyfriend but did not put forth an adequate offer of proof with specific information regarding the date, time, or location of alleged sexual contact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, McNulty, Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.