Colorado Court of Appeals· 8/24/2006

People v. Pahl

Citations

169 P.3d 169
2006 Colo. App. LEXIS 1379
2006 WL 3040920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that tendering an alternative jury instruction is sufficient to preserve instructional error for appeal
noting that it was a “close question” whether the expert testimony at issue crossed the line
holding that the trial court did not err by rejecting misleading instructions
rejecting argument that a defendant must know he or she is selling a security to support a conviction for securities fraud
rejecting prejudice where the defendant did not allege he was unaware of essential facts that differed from the offense as charged
rejecting prejudice where the defendant did not allege he was unaware of essential facts that differed from the offense as charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernard, Webb, Metzger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Pahl

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.