People v. Pahl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that tendering an alternative jury instruction is sufficient to preserve instructional error for appeal
• noting that it was a “close question” whether the expert testimony at issue crossed the line
• holding that the trial court did not err by rejecting misleading instructions
• rejecting argument that a defendant must know he or she is selling a security to support a conviction for securities fraud
• rejecting prejudice where the defendant did not allege he was unaware of essential facts that differed from the offense as charged
• rejecting prejudice where the defendant did not allege he was unaware of essential facts that differed from the offense as charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).