Supreme Court of Colorado· 9/9/2002

People v. Stewart

Citations

55 P.3d 107
2002 Colo. LEXIS 774
2002 WL 31051582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an officer offered expert testimony when he used skidmarks at the scene to reconstruct an accident and deduce a vehicle’s speed, position, and direction
holding that police officer must be qualified as an expert before being allowed to testify about accident reconstruction and inferences he drew therefrom
holding that police officer must be qualified as an expert before being allowed to testify about accident reconstruction and inferences he drew therefrom
holding that where an instruction was not given due to counsel's apparent inadvertence, the court would review the claim of error on appeal
holding, where defense counsel had tendered one instruction but not another, “a nontactical instructional omission generally should be reviewed for plain error”
holding defendant was not entitled to intervening cause instruction because claimed intervening cause did not occur between the unlawful act and the ultimate harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mullarkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

201 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Stewart

430 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.