Skip to main content

People v. Stanley

Citations

  • 170 P.3d 782
  • 2007 Colo. App. LEXIS 609
  • 2007 WL 1017674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A statement of critical opinion about a judge is protected . . . because it serves the principal purpose of the First Amendment — to safeguard public discussion of governmental affairs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.