Michigan Supreme Court· 7/12/1994

People v. Grant

Citations

520 N.W.2d 123
445 Mich. 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

adopting the plain-error test for unpreserved nonconstitutional errors from United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed. 2d 508 (1993)
adopting the plain- error test for unpreserved nonconstitutional errors from United States v Olano, 507 US 725; 113 S Ct 1770; 123 L Ed 2d 508 (1993)
“As a general rule, issues that are not properly raised before a trial court cannot be raised on appeal absent compelling or extraordinary circumstances.”
“[T]he proper interpretation of the term ‘prejudice’ in the context of issue preservation for plain error may be equated with the longstanding state precedent of outcome determination.”
“[T]he proper interpretation of the term ‘prejudice’ in the context of issue preservation for plain error may be equated with the longstanding state precedent of outcome determination.”
“As a general rule, issues that are not properly raised before a trial court cannot be raised on appeal absent compelling or extraordinary circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brickley, Boyle, Griffin, Mallett, Riley, Cavanagh, Levin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.