People v. Czemerynski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that res gestae evidence need not meet the procedural requirement s of 14 CRE 404(b)
• allowing evidence of hundreds of phone calls allegedly made by defendant before and after charged offense
• refusing to address issues not raised in an appellant's original brief but raised for the first time in the reply brief
• noting issues raised for the first time in the reply brief will not be considered
• when prosecution did not have a chance to brief an issue first raised in reply brief, supreme court would not address it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).