People v. Cevallos-Acosta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that erroneous admission of evidence was harmless where prosecutor did not refer to it in closing argument
• concluding that erroneous admission of evidence was harmless where prosecutor did not refer to it in closing argument
• holding that a defendant’s failure to object to the conduct at issue “is a factor to be considered in examining the impact of a prosecutor’s closing argument” (quoting Wallace, 97 P.3d at 269)
• discussing juvenile adjudications as part of a witness's \criminal history\ and ruling that the failure to disclose a pending juvenile case violated Crim. P. 16
• finding no error where the prosecuto r’s discussion of reasonable doubt was brief
• declining to address for the first time on appeal a challenge to a juror because he was an employee of a public law enforcement agency when defendant's only challenge to this juror at trial was that the juror would give special weight to the testimony of a police officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).