District of Columbia· 3/21/2008
Nyunt v. Tomlinson
Citations
- 543 F. Supp. 2d 25
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22036
- 2008 WL 754860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding claim for racial discrimination not exhausted when plaintiff \checked the categories of age and national origin\ in his EEO Complaint but \failed to select\ race as a basis
- holding claim for racial discrimination not exhausted when plaintiff “checked the categories of age and national origin” in his EEO Complaint but “failed to select” race as a basis
- dismissing racial discrimination claim on exhaustion grounds because complainant only made a claim of national origin discrimination in administrative complaint
- dismissing the plaintiff’s claim of racial discrimination because the plaintiff’s EEO complaint only alleged discrimination based on national origin
- rejecting plaintiffs argument that his national origin discrimination claims based on his Burmese national origin can be viewed “as like or reasonably related” to race and can be the basis for a racial discrimination claim
- rejecting plaintiff’s argument that his national origin discrimination claims based on his Burmese national origin can be viewed “as like or reasonably related” to race and can be the basis for a racial discrimination claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John D. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Glass v. LaHoodDistrict of Columbia· 2011-05-20· cited 73×
- Pearsall v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2009-04-28· cited 56×
- Williams v. SpencerDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-13· cited 56×
- Mason v. GeithnerDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-12· cited 55×
- Hyson v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict of Columbia· 2011-08-10· cited 41×
- Cornish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-16· cited 31×
- Grosdidier v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict of Columbia· 2011-05-16· cited 30×
- Demissie v. Starbucks Corporate Office and HeadquartersDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-25· cited 30×
- Hudson v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-21· cited 27×
- Bell v. DonleyDistrict of Columbia· 2010-07-06· cited 27×
- Hicklin, Jr. v. McDonaldDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-08· cited 27×
- Talavera v. ForeDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-31· cited 25×
- Francis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2010-08-18· cited 25×
- Moncada v. PetersDistrict of Columbia· 2008-09-29· cited 23×
- Jianqing Wu v. Special Counsel, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-07-16· cited 20×
- Dick v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2015-02-19· cited 19×
- Howard v. FentyDistrict of Columbia· 2008-09-29· cited 18×
- Bowe-Connor v. ShinsekiDistrict of Columbia· 2013-01-25· cited 18×
- Hopkins v. WhippleDistrict of Columbia· 2009-06-30· cited 17×
- Kilby-Robb v. DuncanDistrict of Columbia· 2015-01-08· cited 16×
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court· 1993-04-20· cited 1,653×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.