Francis v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff failed to provide adequate pre-suit notice of claims when notice was provided before the injury occurred
• holding that “no reasonable jury could find [candidate] unqualified for the position” even though he was two grades lower than plaintiff’s position given candidate’s other employment and educational experience
• “Construing the record in the light most favorable to [plaintiff], no reasonable jury could find [the selectee] unqualified for the position of Protective Services Manager, nor could it find [plaintiff] significantly better qualified.”
• “Construing the record in the light most favorable to [plaintiff], no reasonable jury could find [the selectee] unqualified for the position of Protective Services Manager, nor could it find [plaintiff] significantly better qualified.”
• “Hence, the Court looks to whether temporal proximity, in combination with the employer’s knowledge, is sufficient to support an inference of a causation.”
• “Hence, the Court looks to whether temporal proximity, in combination with the employer’s knowledge, is sufficient to support an inference of a causation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).