Skip to main content
· 3/3/1993

Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit

Citations

  • 507 U.S. 163
  • 113 S. Ct. 1160
  • 122 L. Ed. 2d 517
  • 1993 U.S. LEXIS 1941
  • 61 U.S.L.W. 4205
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1493
  • 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 428
  • 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 40
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 2747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a heightened standard of pleading, judicially created, is not permitted in civil rights cases
  • holding that Monell claims are not subject to a heightened pleading standard
  • noting that factual allegations in complaint must be accepted as true on motion to dismiss
  • holding that the fact that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b
  • indicating that the doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius operates to prevent courts from expanding Rule 9(b)'s stringent pleading requirements to other causes of action
  • indicating that “federal courts and litigants must rely on summary judgment and control of discovery to weed out un-meritorious claims sooner rather than later”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rehnquist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.