Kilby-Robb v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying this standard to find that Kilby-Robb was not “significantly better qualified” than the candidate selected for a different position in 2005
• granting summary judgment for the Department on race and age discrimination nonselection claims and denying summary judgment on retaliation claims
• “procedural irregularities in the selection process also may demonstrate that the employer’s justification for a hiring or promotion decision was pretex-tual.” (citing Hamilton, 666 F.3d at 1355)
• Huh Aff. ¶¶ 12, 14

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).