Skip to main content
· 4/17/1974

Scheuer v. Rhodes

Citations

  • 416 U.S. 232
  • 94 S. Ct. 1683
  • 40 L. Ed. 2d 90
  • 1974 U.S. LEXIS 126
  • 71 Ohio Op. 2d 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff in an employment-discrimination case need not establish her prima-facie case in the complaint
  • recognizing that officers must “often act swiftly and firmly at the risk that action deferred would be futile or constitute a virtual abdication of office”
  • stating that allegations of a complaint should be favorably construed for the pleader
  • stating that allegations of a complaint should be favorably construed for the pleader
  • holding that executive branch officers had qualified immunity
  • stating that allegations of a complaint should be favorably construed for the pleader

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buegee, Burger, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.