Supreme Court· 4/17/1974
Scheuer v. Rhodes
Citations
- 416 U.S. 232
- 94 S. Ct. 1683
- 40 L. Ed. 2d 90
- 1974 U.S. LEXIS 126
- 71 Ohio Op. 2d 474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff in an employment-discrimination case need not establish her prima-facie case in the complaint
- recognizing that officers must “often act swiftly and firmly at the risk that action deferred would be futile or constitute a virtual abdication of office”
- stating that allegations of a complaint should be favorably construed for the pleader
- stating that allegations of a complaint should be favorably construed for the pleader
- holding that executive branch officers had qualified immunity
- stating that allegations of a complaint should be favorably construed for the pleader
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buegee, Burger, Douglas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8,481 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaSecond Circuit· 2006-12-05· cited 6,436×
- Hall v. BellmonTenth Circuit· 1991-06-03· cited 5,616×
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffThird Circuit· 1997-06-10· cited 4,496×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 4,123×
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court· 1991-11-05· cited 4,063×
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesTenth Circuit· 2008-03-21· cited 3,738×
- Starr v. BacaNinth Circuit· 2011-07-25· cited 3,401×
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 3,397×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court· 1967-04-11· cited 4,282×
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court· 1941-10-13· cited 2,081×
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-06-08· cited 1,757×
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court· 1945-01-08· cited 1,526×
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court· 1951-05-21· cited 1,470×
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 1,312×
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 1,302×
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 1,272×
- Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 778×
- Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 583×
- United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 538×
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 492×
- Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court· 1944-04-24· cited 463×
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 434×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1966-02-24· cited 407×
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court· 1932-12-12· cited 368×
- Yaselli v. GoffSecond Circuit· 1926-04-05· cited 285×
Other cases named Scheuer v. Rhodes
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.