Skip to main content
· 2/26/2002

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.

Citations

  • 534 U.S. 506
  • 122 S. Ct. 992
  • 152 L. Ed. 2d 1
  • 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff need not even plead a prima facie case of discrimination to satisfy Rule 8(a)
  • noting that the elements of a prima facie case provide an outline of what would make a plaintiffs employment discrimination claim plausible
  • applying the same pleading standard to claims under Title VII and the ADEA
  • observing that Swierkiewicz survived Twombly and Iqbal
  • “Rule 8(a) is the starting point of a simplified pleading system, 7 which was adopted to focus litigation on the merits of a claim.”
  • “It is unnecessary and inappropriate to instruct the jury on the McDonnell Douglas analy- sis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.