Skip to main content

Nichols v. State

Citations

  • 754 S.W.2d 185
  • 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67
  • 1988 WL 32004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there is no coercion where appellant testified that he knew what he was doing but would not have been so easily persuaded had he not been intoxicated
  • “The central question is the extent to which appellant was deprived of his faculties due to the intoxication.”
  • arrest and subsequent questioning does not initiate adverse judicial proceedings
  • arrest and subsequent questioning does not initiate adverse judicial proceedings
  • arrest and subsequent questioning does not initiate adverse judicial proceedings
  • venireman preoccupied with personal problems

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Teague, Clinton, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

130 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.