Skip to main content

Gardner v. State

Citations

  • 730 S.W.2d 675
  • 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence that defendant had been incarcerated, unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine efficacy of trial court’s instruction to disregard
  • concluding that evidence that defendant had been incarcerated, unembell- ished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine efficacy of trial court’s instruction to disregard
  • holding that testimony that appellant had been to the penitentiary was 10 not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court’s instruction to disregard
  • holding that reviewing court must presume that jury will obey instruction to disregard
  • holding witness’s testimony during State’s cross-examination that, when defendant was in the penitentiary, he had stomach problems attributable to drug withdrawal was not so inflammatory as to require a mistrial
  • holding the same where witness testified that appellant “told me that even when he was in the penitentiary, that he had stomach problems”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Onion, Teague, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

363 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.