Skip to main content

Dunn v. State

Citations

  • 819 S.W.2d 510
  • 1991 WL 77609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court’s inquiry was adequate given the circumstances of the case
  • holding right to effective assistance of counsel “cannot be manipulated in such a manner so as to throw the trial process into disarray”
  • holding right to effective assistance of counsel “cannot be manipulated in such a manner so as to throw the trial process into disarray”
  • observing that “appellant never made any claim that there existed a conflict of interest which actually affected the adequacy of his representation”
  • holding defendant failed to 8 DeLeon heavily relies on State v. Heath, 696 S.W.3d 677 (Tex. Crim. App. 2024
  • observing that, despite defendant’s many objections to appointed counsel, he “never made any claim that there existed a conflict of interest which actually affected the adequacy of his representation by [his court-appointed counsel].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet, Baird, Clinton, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

147 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Dunn v. State

243 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.