Mann v. Oppenheimer & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting test applied by the U.S. Supreme Court in Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 78, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975)
• reciting 36 422 U.S. 66 (1975). In Cort, the Supreme Court enumerated four factors: (1) whether the plaintiff was “one of the class for whose especial benefit the statute was enacted”; (2
• in addition to fact that General Assembly did not expressly authorize private right of action, other relevant factors, such as whether plaintiffs were members of a class for whose benefit the statute was created, argued against finding a private right of action
• using House committee report to determine legislative history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).