Comet Systems, Inc. Shareholders' Agent v. MIVA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[m]ere allegations or denials are not sufficient to avoid summary judgment”
• finding contract terms to be controlling when a court use them to determine parties’ common meaning
• denying Rule 56(f) motion that had not been presented with an accompanying affidavit
• “The determination of whether a contract is ambiguous is a question for the court to resolve as a matter of law.”
• “The determination of whether a contract is ambiguous is a question for the court to resolve as a matter of law.”
• “The ‘determination of whether a contract is ambiguous is a question for the court to resolve as a matter of law.’” (quoting NBC Universal, 2005 WL 1038997, at )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).