NAMA Holdings, LLC v. Related World Market Center, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that NAMA's \right to inspect books and records\ stood alone, separate from issues that must be arbitrated
• holding where “an alleged injury still exists despite the occurrence of intervening events, a justiciable controversy remains, and the mootness doctrine will not operate to deprive a court of jurisdiction to hear the case.”
• explaining that any benefits a party received from a contract with an arbitration clause were “strictly indirect” because of the structure of the party’s ownership interest—the party was the principal investor in the organization which owned a signatory to the contract
• finding nonsignatory not bound by arbitration clause unless conferred with signatory status under common law
• finding third-party beneficiary had standing to bring a claim under one section of the contract only
• “[T]he strong public policy in favor of arbitration embodied in federal law is given equal respect in this State…”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).