Skip to main content
· 5/19/1967

The Greater Iowa Corporation v. Frank McLendon

Citations

  • 378 F.2d 783
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the requirements of the Proxy Rules to a solicitation for membership in a voting trust
  • “We think dissenting security holders have absolute right to challenge management and to question entrenched management’s stewardship. No arbitrary blocks or barriers should be raised by the courts in exercising this phase of corporate suffrage.”
  • solicitation by mail and telephone sufficient for federal jurisdiction to attach
  • private action must be brought under Section 12(2) and not under Section 17(a). 10 . Bosse v. Crowell, Collier and MacMillan, 565 F.2d 602, 610 n. 12 (9th Cir. 1977); White v. Abrams, 495 F.2d 724, 727 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1974

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Mehaffy, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.