In Re General Motors (Hughes) Shareholder Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Court of Chancery did not err when it took judicial notice of stockholder vote approving transactions where there existed no reasonable dispute as to whether stockholder approval had occurred
• holding that trial courts may take judicial notice of facts in SEC filings that are “not subject to reasonable dispute”
• holding that trial courts may take judicial notice of facts in SEC filings that are “not subject to reasonable dispute”
• holding that this Court may, when considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, take judicial notice of SEC documents not subject to reasonable dispute
• holding that the court will deny a motion to dismiss “unless the plaintiff would not be entitled to recover under any reasonably conceivable set of circumstances”
• holding that the Court of Chancery may take judicial notice of the result of a stockholder vote approving transactions where there was no reasonable dispute about the vote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).