United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “more than two centur[y]”-old “prohibition on modifying judgments in favor of a nonappealing party”
• “[T]he appellee may, without taking a cross-appeal, urge in support of a decree any matter appearing in the record .. ..”
• “the appellee may not attack the decree with a view either to enlarging his own rights thereunder or of lessening the rights of his adversary” without bringing a cross-appeal
• appellee may, without taking a cross-appeal, urge in support of a decree any matter appearing in the record
• “[T]he appellee may, without taking a cross-appeal, urge in support of a decree any matter appearing in the record.... ”
• “[T]he appellee may, without taking a cross- appeal, urge in support of a decree any matter appearing in the record . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).