Supreme Court· 6/18/1979

Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington

Citations

442 U.S. 560
99 S. Ct. 2479
61 L. Ed. 2d 82
1979 U.S. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a right of action must be clear from the text of the statute
holding that even if construction of statute sanctioned injustice, the Court was not at liberty to legislate
holding that even if construction of statute sanctioned injustice, the Court was not at liberty to legislate
holding that a right of action must be clear from the text of the statute
holding that “[t]here is no implied private cause of action for damages under § 17(a)” of the Exchange Act
holding that no implied private cause of action exists under Section 10 of RESPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Retinquist, Rehnqttist, Btjrger, Bkennan, Stewakt, White, Blackmtjn, Stevens, Brennan, Marshall, Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,330 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.