Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a right of action must be clear from the text of the statute
• holding that even if construction of statute sanctioned injustice, the Court was not at liberty to legislate
• holding that even if construction of statute sanctioned injustice, the Court was not at liberty to legislate
• holding that a right of action must be clear from the text of the statute
• holding that “[t]here is no implied private cause of action for damages under § 17(a)” of the Exchange Act
• holding that no implied private cause of action exists under Section 10 of RESPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington
  Supreme Court· 1978-11-27
• Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15