Skip to main content

Maldonado v. State

Citations

  • 998 S.W.2d 239
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 87
  • 1999 WL 438988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that specific intent to rob may be inferred from circumstantial evidence and from defendant = s conduct
  • stating that “[p]roof of a completed theft is not required to establish the underlying offense of robbery.”
  • stating that \[p]roof of a completed theft is not required to establish the underlying offense of robbery.\
  • holding the trial court did not err in refusing to suppress a recorded statement when the evidence supported the conclusion that the recording was accurate and had not been impermissibly altered
  • admitting tape-recorded confession that included two skips or anomalies when there was “adequate evidence” that the anomalies were “inadvertent and did not affect the overall reliability of the tape”
  • affirming admission of video that contained gaps of a few seconds in the conversation because the evidence supported the conclusion that the anomalies occurred accidentally and obscured nothing of value in the dialogue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Price, Johnson, Womack, McCormick, Mansfield, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.