Skip to main content

Burks v. State

Citations

  • 876 S.W.2d 877
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 31
  • 1994 WL 68881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police officer’s erroneously admitted hearsay testimony did not harm defendant when testimony of other trial witnesses proved same facts
  • holding that police officer’s erroneously admitted hearsay testimony did not harm defendant when testimony of other trial witnesses proved same facts
  • holding that erroneously admitted backdoor hearsay was harmless because other testimony proved the same facts
  • holding that erroneously admitted backdoor hearsay was harmless because other testimony proved same facts
  • holding that erroneously admitted backdoor hearsay was harmless because other testimony proved same facts
  • holding that to preserve error, counsel must “let the trial judge know what he wants, why he thinks himself entitled to it, and [] do so clearly enough for the judge to understand him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Clinton, Maloney, Miller, McCormick, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

334 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

110 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Burks v. State

101 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.