Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/12/1996
Jordan v. State
Citations
- 928 S.W.2d 550
- 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 80
- 1996 WL 313228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure of expert on eyewitness identification to take into account certain facts is matter of weight and credibility, not admissibility
- explaining that “this connection is not so much a matter of proof, however, as a matter of application”
- concluding testimony must be specifically tied to the facts of the case and not simply an academic discussion on a field of study
- noting that it was a matter of application not a matter of proof
- noting that the facts upon which an expert testimony is based do not need to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt and that the expert may assume the truth of the facts in order to give her testimony
- noting that the facts upon which an expert testimony is based do not need to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt and that the expert may assume the truth of the facts in order to give her testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Maloney, McCORMICK, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
204 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court· 1997-11-13· cited 3,583×
- Weatherred v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-29· cited 1,191×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-17· cited 1,065×
- Coble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-13· cited 848×
- Wolfe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-02-15· cited 828×
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-12-06· cited 697×
- Nenno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-06-24· cited 479×
- Tillman, Larry Joseph Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-10-05· cited 430×
- Layton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-02-04· cited 375×
- Vela v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-12-13· cited 303×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-31· cited 265×
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-06· cited 258×
- Roise v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-12-02· cited 252×
- Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-08-14· cited 250×
- Rhomer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-01-30· cited 245×
- Hartman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-04-23· cited 208×
- Franks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-24· cited 191×
- Griffith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 158×
- Fowler v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1998-03-11· cited 148×
- Everitt, Michael PaulCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-02-06· cited 129×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-08· cited 1,699×
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-02-24· cited 1,521×
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-05· cited 1,156×
- United States v. John W. DowningThird Circuit· 1985-01-25· cited 627×
- Yount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-12-08· cited 477×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-08· cited 294×
- Fielder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-08· cited 169×
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-13· cited 100×
- New York State Departmet of Labor v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 90×
- Zani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-27· cited 72×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-14· cited 51×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.