Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/6/2001
Mata v. State
Citations
- 46 S.W.3d 902
- 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 45
- 2001 WL 611447
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that testing blood-alcohol concentration more than two hours after the alleged offense seriously affects the reliability of any extrapolation
- holding that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the State’s evidence of retrograde extrapolation
- holding that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the State’s evidence of retrograde extrapolation
- holding that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the State’s evidence of retrograde extrapolation
- holding that trial court erred in admitting testimony of state’s expert, who, in applying retrograde extrapolation analysis, failed to consider sufficient factors to obtain reliable result
- recognizing, “E.M.P. Wid-mark first calculated absorption and elimination rates in the body, and his work still represents the benchmark for other scientists’ studies today.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keasler, Meyers, Price, Holland, Johnson, Holcomb, Keller, Womack, Hervey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
188 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MechlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-12· cited 667×
- Bigon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-01-16· cited 588×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-10-21· cited 550×
- Bagheri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-11-05· cited 324×
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2011-12-29· cited 263×
- State v. Villarreal, DavidCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-11-26· cited 256×
- Rhomer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-01-30· cited 245×
- Kirsch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-02-10· cited 235×
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-13· cited 210×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-04· cited 179×
- State v. JordanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-06-29· cited 103×
- State v. NeesleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-07· cited 96×
- Crider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-11-16· cited 65×
- Garcia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-08-07· cited 63×
- DeLeon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-08-31· cited 62×
- Esaw Lampkin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-08-11· cited 60×
- Acevedo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-01-30· cited 58×
- Blumenstetter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-04-06· cited 55×
- State v. DugasTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-09-10· cited 54×
- Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-05-08· cited 53×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-05· cited 1,156×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-17· cited 1,065×
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-13· cited 407×
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-07-03· cited 380×
- Mireles v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTexas Supreme Court· 1999-12-09· cited 310×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-06-12· cited 289×
- Hinojosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-27· cited 254×
- Griffith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-16· cited 158×
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-12-17· cited 52×
- Desmond v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1989-04-06· cited 47×
- State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-15· cited 47×
- Kapuscinski v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1994-05-25· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-09· cited 41×
- McCafferty v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-03-10· cited 39×
- State v. ReedTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1994-10-19· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. WirthKentucky Supreme Court· 1996-09-26· cited 36×
- State v. RollinsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-03-25· cited 34×
- State v. GeislerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-05-11· cited 33×
- Haas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-19· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.