Skip to main content

Mata v. State

Citations

  • 46 S.W.3d 902
  • 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 45
  • 2001 WL 611447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that testing blood-alcohol concentration more than two hours after the alleged offense seriously affects the reliability of any extrapolation
  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the State’s evidence of retrograde extrapolation
  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the State’s evidence of retrograde extrapolation
  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the State’s evidence of retrograde extrapolation
  • holding that trial court erred in admitting testimony of state’s expert, who, in applying retrograde extrapolation analysis, failed to consider sufficient factors to obtain reliable result
  • recognizing, “E.M.P. Wid-mark first calculated absorption and elimination rates in the body, and his work still represents the benchmark for other scientists’ studies today.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Meyers, Price, Holland, Johnson, Holcomb, Keller, Womack, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

188 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.