Skip to main content

Pierce v. State

Citations

  • 777 S.W.2d 399
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161
  • 1989 WL 104646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that expert’s testimony failed to apply general principles of unreliability in eyewitness testimony to specific facts of case
  • holding that appellant's failure to cite to relevant portions of the record and to set out the legal theory supporting his contention means that nothing is presented for review
  • holding that appellant’s failure to cite to relevant portions of the record and to set out the legal theory supporting his contention means that nothing is presented for review
  • expert could not say which scientific principles he discussed were applicable to facts in case and he had no knowledge of witnesses’ testimony
  • expert could not say which scientific principles he discussed were applicable to facts in case and he had no knowledge of witnesses' testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Court'S, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.