Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 921 So. 2d 490
  • 2005 WL 729169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defense of consent to a burglary charge must be raised at trial or on direct appeal
  • holding defendant’s claim that further questioning of jurors could have exposed more on the jurors’ views was speculation that “fails to rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland.”
  • finding because the prosecutor and court had adequately questioned jurors, counsel could not be deficient for failing to repeat questioning
  • \The State cannot be said to have suppressed evidence that the defendant himself had knowledge of.\
  • \Consent obtained by trick or fraud is actually no consent at all and will not serve as a defense to burglary.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.