Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 903 So. 2d 888
  • 2005 WL 729182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to challenge standard instruction as unconstitutional before being declared so by supreme court
  • rejecting appellant’s argument that trial counsel could have used peremptory challenges in a different manner to obtain a more defense-friendly jury; “[s]uch speculation fails to rise to the level of ineffective assistance under Strickland . . . .”
  • “In order for the statement of one venire member to taint the panel, the venire member must mention facts that would not otherwise be presented to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.