Skip to main content

Solorzano v. State

Citations

  • 25 So. 3d 19
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16881
  • 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because a claim was denied on its merits, the defendant is not entitled to leave to amend under Spera
  • noting that it may be error to exclude otherwise cumulative evidence when the evidence is offered from a source that “‘differ[s] in quality and substance’ from that of the other witnesses” (quoting Valle v. State, 502 So.2d 1225, 1226 (Fla.1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Villanti, Kelly, Khouzam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.