District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/4/2006

State v. Pitts

Citations

936 So. 2d 1111
2006 WL 2191318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the context preceding the defendant’s initial response of “[n]o sir” when asked if he was willing to speak to the officer made the statement equivocal
holding that defendant's confession to holding a gun on a then missing person meant \a reasonable person in [defendant's] situation would have understood that he would not be allowed to go free.\
holding that despite the early hour of the police visit (4 a.m.
holding that suspect in custody after confessing to “serious crime”
explaining that appellate courts should affirm “even if the specific basis for affirmance has not been articulated by the appellee”
observing that the suspect’s mother’s presence during the interview made the circumstances of the interview less coercive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.