Skip to main content
· 10/26/2012

John Anderson v. Patrick Donahoe

Citations

  • 699 F.3d 989
  • 26 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1761
  • 19 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1451
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22218
  • 2012 WL 5275254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff cannot amend his complaint through arguments in his brief to a motion for summary judgment
  • holding that a plaintiff “cannot amend his complaint ‘through arguments in his brief to a motion for summary judgment’”
  • holding that “a plaintiff may not amend his complaint through arguments in his brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment”
  • holding that a plaintiff cannot amend his complaint through arguments in his brief to a motion for summary judgment
  • finding that a claim raised for the first time in opposition to summary judgment has been waived
  • holding plaintiff waived claims he failed to assert in operative complaint but raised at summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Sykes, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.