· 10/28/2004
Carol Hottenroth v. Village of Slinger
Citations
- 388 F.3d 1015
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22446
- 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,798
- 2004 WL 2554651
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the denial of a discretionary benefit did not constitute an adverse employment action
- concluding that the denial of a discretionary benefit did not constitute an adverse employment action
- concluding that the denial of a discretionary benefit did not constitute an adverse employment action
- stating that a genuine issue is one on which “a reasonable fact finder could find for the nonmoving party”
- stating that a genuine issue is one on which “a reasonable fact finder could find for the nonmoving party”
- stating that a genuine issue is one on which “a reasonable fact finder could find for the nonmoving party”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.