James Kersting v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 6025 A/K/A Wal-Mart Distribution Center and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that verbal warnings without being accompanied by any tangible job consequence do not amount to adverse employment actions
• holding that oral and written warnings did not constitute materially adverse employment actions
• noting that a plaintiff may pursue a claim not explicitly included in an administrative complaint if the allegations are \like or reasonably related to\ those in the charge
• “[T]he EEOC charge and the complaint must, at minimum, describe the same conduct and implicate the same individuals.” (citation omitted)
• “Due to the petition, it was determined that completing the survey would be an exercise in futility.”
• the plaintiff alleged six incidents of retaliation, but the court properly considered only incidents raised in the EEOC charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).