Caskey v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “She argues that during this time period she suffered from anxiety, depression, and various other minor ailments, but does not adequately apply these afflictions to the legal standard.”
• “To prevail on [his] FMLA interference claim, [Plaintiff] must establish: (1) [he] was eligible for the FMLA's protections; (2) [his] employer was covered by the FMLA; (3) [he] was entitled to leave under the FMLA; (4
• plaintiff suffering from depression and anxiety did not meet serious health condition definition because she did not offer evidence of “incapacity” or that she “receive[d] either treatment two or more times by a health care provider or a ‘regimen of continuing treatment’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).