Ralph L. Grayson v. Paul O'neill, Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant could not raise retaliation claim for the first time on appeal
• holding plaintiff “ ‘may not amend his complaint through arguments in his brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment’ ” (quoting Shanahan v. City of Chicago, 82 F.3d 776, 781 (7th Cir. 1996))
• declining to re-open discovery where discovery had been extended multiple times and information was available to movant who was not diligent in conducting discovery
• affirming the denial of a request for more discovery when plaintiff “offered no explanation for his failure to uncover the evidence” earlier
• finding claims raised for the first time in opposition to summary judgment waived
• “[A] plaintiff may not amend his complaint through arguments in his brief in opposition to a motion for summary judg- ment.” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).