Kenneth Harper v. C.R. England, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court’s favor toward the non-moving party does not extend to inferences supported by only speculation or conjecture
• affirming judgment against plaintiff because he failed to show that he was treated less favorably than similarly situation individuals
• finding gap of three and a half to five months between complaints and termination too lengthy to support inference of retaliation
• discussing Coleman concurrence and applying a more streamlined, collapsed version of the direct/indirect tests
• “[T]he line between circumstantial evidence under the direct method and indirect evidence of discrimination or retaliation under the burden-shifting approach has been blurred by the gradual integration of these methodologies.”
• inferences that are supported only by speculation or conjecture will not defeat a summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).