Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Arizona Supreme Court· 5/10/1990

Jepson v. New

Citations

  • 792 P.2d 728
  • 164 Ariz. 265
  • 60 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
  • 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although the record must show plaintiff is actively pursuing the case, discovery initiated by other parties may benefit plaintiff as well
  • noting that although the record must show plaintiff is actively pursuing the ease, discovery initiated by other parties may benefit plaintiff as well
  • explaining statute provides both automatic and discretionary relief depending on the reason for dismissal
  • referring to criteria to be considered when determining if equitable tolling should apply
  • vacating Jepson v. New, 160 Ariz. 193, 772 P.2d 16 (App.1989)
  • abuse of discretion standard in reviewing denial of Rule 60(c) relief and dismissals for lack of prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Corcoran, Ariz, Const, Lacagnina, Gordon, Cameron, Moeller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Jepson v. New

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.