Resolution Trust Corp. v. Maricopa County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that attorney’s failure to complete basic tasks to prevent case dismissal was not reasonable under the circumstances, and thus not excusable
• rejecting attorney’s unsubstantiated claim that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome should constitute excusable neglect when attorney's illness not sudden, attorney did not seek help, and attorney maintained social and civic commitments
• rejecting attorney’s unsubstantiated claim that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome should constitute excusable neglect when attorney’s illness not sudden, attorney did not seek help, and attorney maintained social and civic commitments
• counsel’s Chronic Fatigue Syndrome not a sudden illness constituting excusable neglect under Civ.R. 60

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Porter v. Spader
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-09-21· cited 21×
• Everbank v. Vanarnhem
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-09· cited 4×
• McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-11-09

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Devenir Associates v. City of Phoenix
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-11-19· cited 82×
• Gorman v. City of Phoenix
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-09· cited 54×
• Jepson v. New
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 52×
• Walker v. Kendig
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-10-14· cited 38×