Arizona Supreme Court· 1/24/1980
Rimondi v. Briggs
Citations
- 606 P.2d 412
- 124 Ariz. 561
- 1980 Ariz. LEXIS 164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the witness did not provide expert testimony because he related his observations but did not testify on what actually caused the accident
- absent prejudice, rulings on the admission or exclusion of evidence will not be reversed
- trial court has considerable discretion in ruling on the admission of photographs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Struckmeyer, Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Selby v. SavardArizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-18· cited 88×
- Dunlap v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-03-08· cited 65×
- Jepson v. NewArizona Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 52×
- Lohmeier v. HammerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-12-12· cited 47×
- Walters v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court· 1982-02-01· cited 44×
- Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-04· cited 43×
- Hallmark v. Allied Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-06-01· cited 31×
- Pizziconi v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-23· cited 17×
- Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-11-24· cited 15×
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-09· cited 13×
- State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-03-16· cited 9×
- Groener v. BriehlCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-06· cited 8×
- Duran v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-09-30· cited 5×
- State v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-09-22· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court· 1962-01-17· cited 117×
- Nichols v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court· 1949-01-24· cited 68×
- Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-08-02· cited 53×
- Webb v. HardinArizona Supreme Court· 1939-04-10· cited 43×
- Tucker v. CollarArizona Supreme Court· 1955-06-14· cited 41×
- Arizona Public Service Company v. BrittainArizona Supreme Court· 1971-06-23· cited 28×
- Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. ShawlerArizona Supreme Court· 1976-11-18· cited 28×
- Kelch v. CoursonArizona Supreme Court· 1968-11-27· cited 25×
- Porterie v. PetersArizona Supreme Court· 1975-03-05· cited 24×
- Anderson v. GobeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-10-17· cited 24×
- Winchester v. PalkoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-19· cited 17×
- Brierley v. Anaconda CompanyArizona Supreme Court· 1974-06-04· cited 17×
- Mantovani v. GreenArizona Supreme Court· 1962-01-17· cited 17×
- Baker v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-02-18· cited 8×
- Purchase v. MARDIAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-03-26· cited 7×
- Arnold v. Frigid Food Express Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-05-29· cited 7×
- Southern Pacific Company v. CavalloArizona Supreme Court· 1958-03-19· cited 6×
- Shaya v. PetzoldtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-11-15· cited 3×
- Rhind v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-05-07· cited 2×
- Steed v. CuevasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-09-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.