Johnson v. Elson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining an appellate court may infer additional findings of fact and conclusions of law necessary to uphold the decree if they are reasonably supported by the evidence and do not conflict with express findings
• “When no transcript is provided on appeal, the reviewing court assumes that the record supports the trial court’s decision.”
• “When no transcript is provided on appeal, the reviewing court assumes that the record supports the [superior] court’s decision.”
• “When no transcript is provided on appeal, the reviewing court assumes that the record supports the trial court’s decision.”
• appellate court may infer additional findings of fact and conclusions of law necessary to uphold the decree if they are reasonably supported by the evidence and do not conflict with express findings
• “[W]e may infer additional findings of fact . . . sufficient to sustain the [superior] court’s order as long as those findings are reasonably supported by the evidence, and not in conflict with any express findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).