Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/17/1996
Curtis v. Morris
Citations
- 909 P.2d 460
- 184 Ariz. 393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that title cannot be an issue in a FED 3 BANK OF NY v. ST. JOHN Decision of the Court action
- stating that title cannot be an issue in an FED action
- “Because an FED action does not bar subsequent proceedings [to determine other issues], those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than FED actions].”
- “Because an FED action does not bar subsequent proceedings between the parties to determine issues other than the immediate right to possession, those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than FED actions].”
- “Because an FED action does not bar subsequent proceedings between the parties to determine issues other than the immediate right to possession, those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than FED actions].”
- “Because [a forcible detainer] action does not bar subsequent proceedings between the parties to determine issues other than the immediate right to possession, those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than forcible detainer actions].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGregor, Contreras, Shelley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-03-20· cited 48×
- Curtis v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-24· cited 25×
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-15· cited 8×
- State v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-23· cited 5×
- Pijanowski v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-04-02· cited 3×
- State of Arizona v. John Robert EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-23
- Tucson Lot 4, LLC v. Sunquest Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-11-22
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court· 1987-12-10· cited 127×
- Jepson v. NewArizona Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 52×
- Whitfield Transportation, Inc. v. BrooksArizona Supreme Court· 1956-10-23· cited 44×
- Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court· 1946-03-25· cited 43×
- Scappaticci v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 40×
- Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-05· cited 30×
- Patterson v. Maricopa County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-16· cited 25×
- Hinton v. HotchkissArizona Supreme Court· 1946-11-25· cited 20×
- Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-14· cited 17×
- Allen v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court· 1959-09-23· cited 16×
- Davies v. RussellArizona Supreme Court· 1958-05-14· cited 14×
- Merrifield v. MerrifieldArizona Supreme Court· 1963-12-30· cited 12×
- Taylor v. StanfordArizona Supreme Court· 1966-05-18· cited 12×
- Jepson v. NewCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-05-02· cited 7×
- Bishop v. PerrinArizona Supreme Court· 1894-01-18· cited 6×
- Moreno v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-07-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.