Skip to main content

Curtis v. Morris

Citations

  • 909 P.2d 460
  • 184 Ariz. 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that title cannot be an issue in a FED 3 BANK OF NY v. ST. JOHN Decision of the Court action
  • stating that title cannot be an issue in an FED action
  • “Because an FED action does not bar subsequent proceedings [to determine other issues], those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than FED actions].”
  • “Because an FED action does not bar subsequent proceedings between the parties to determine issues other than the immediate right to possession, those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than FED actions].”
  • “Because an FED action does not bar subsequent proceedings between the parties to determine issues other than the immediate right to possession, those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than FED actions].”
  • “Because [a forcible detainer] action does not bar subsequent proceedings between the parties to determine issues other than the immediate right to possession, those issues are better resolved in proceedings [other than forcible detainer actions].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Contreras, Shelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.