· 8/12/1986
Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.
Citations
- 724 P.2d 63
- 150 Ariz. 444
- 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating the trial court treated the parties' stipulation to continue the case on the inactive calendar as a motion to continue
- the rule “does not encompass situations . . . where a party merely asks the court to reconsider a previous legal ruling”
- “Parties to litigation . . . have a responsibility to the court and their counsel to assist in permitting their litigation to proceed in timely fashion, and [are] held responsible for doing so.”
- interpreting Civil Rule 60(b), then Civil Rule 60(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul G. Ulrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.