Skip to main content
· 8/12/1986

Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.

Citations

  • 724 P.2d 63
  • 150 Ariz. 444
  • 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating the trial court treated the parties' stipulation to continue the case on the inactive calendar as a motion to continue
  • the rule “does not encompass situations . . . where a party merely asks the court to reconsider a previous legal ruling”
  • “Parties to litigation . . . have a responsibility to the court and their counsel to assist in permitting their litigation to proceed in timely fashion, and [are] held responsible for doing so.”
  • interpreting Civil Rule 60(b), then Civil Rule 60(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul G. Ulrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.