· 9/21/2010
Porter v. Spader
Citations
- 239 P.3d 743
- 225 Ariz. 424
- 591 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
- 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that, as a matter of equity, a limitations period may be tolled when a defendant affirmatively defrauded or misled the plaintiff
- explaining statutes of limitation establish the period after which claims are “too stale to be enforceable”
- declining to apply equitable tolling in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, fraud, or concealment that misled the party from recognizing a legal wrong or seeking timely redress
- A limitation period may be equitably tolled when the defendant’s affirmative acts of fraud or concealment induced the plaintiff to delay seeking timely legal redress.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winthrop, Johnsen, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.