Skip to main content
· 9/21/2010

Porter v. Spader

Citations

  • 239 P.3d 743
  • 225 Ariz. 424
  • 591 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
  • 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, as a matter of equity, a limitations period may be tolled when a defendant affirmatively defrauded or misled the plaintiff
  • explaining statutes of limitation establish the period after which claims are “too stale to be enforceable”
  • declining to apply equitable tolling in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, fraud, or concealment that misled the party from recognizing a legal wrong or seeking timely redress
  • A limitation period may be equitably tolled when the defendant’s affirmative acts of fraud or concealment induced the plaintiff to delay seeking timely legal redress.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winthrop, Johnsen, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.