· 10/14/1971
Walker v. Kendig
Citations
- 489 P.2d 849
- 107 Ariz. 510
- 1971 Ariz. LEXIS 351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, although dismissal from inactive calendar for lack of prosecution is without prejudice, “such an order must be issued only after careful consideration because justice requires that when possible a matter be determined upon its merits”
- applying Ariz. R. Civ. P. 60(c): “It would be extremely unjust to enforce the judgment of dismissal in this case” because “relief should be granted to the extent of allowing the plaintiff a fair opportunity to present his claim on the merits.”
- abuse of discretion to dismiss for plaintiffs failure to set for trial within court imposed deadlines
- “[V]erified sudden illness usually presents exceptional circumstances under which a reasonably prudent attorney could be ‘excused’ from properly carrying out his practice.”
- when making discretionary determination, trial court may rely on “ ‘personal wisdom and experience’”
- “Although a dismissal under [Uniform] Rule V(d) is without prejudice, such an order must be issued only after careful consideration because justice requires that when possible a matter be determined upon its merits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockwood, Struckmeyer, Udall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.